Back to the Supreme Court Cases Inquiry Learning Page

Constitutional Connection

Commerce Clause - The Congress shall have Power To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

U.S. v. Lopez (1995) was a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Commerce Clause. It was the first case since 1937 in which the Court held that Congress had exceeded its power to legislate under the Commerce Clause.

Key Facts

Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade high school student, carried a concealed weapon into his San Antonio, Texas high school. He was charged under Texas law with firearm possession on school premises. The next day, the state charges were dismissed after federal agents charged Lopez with violating a federal criminal statute, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The act forbids "any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that [he] knows...is a school zone." Lopez was found guilty following a bench trial and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and two years' supervised release.

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that federal laws had supremacy, or authority, over state laws. But what happens if Congress passes a law that it does not have the right to pass? Does that law still have authority over a state law? The decision in United States v. Lopez wrestled with that question.

Big Question

Is the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act, forbidding individuals from knowingly carrying a gun in a school zone, unconstitutional because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause?

Holding

5-4. Yes. The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.

Impact of case

US v. Lopez preserved the system of federalism, which delegates certain powers to states and certain powers to the federal government. It upheld the principle that states have control of local issues, like gun possession on school grounds.

The case was the first in a long time that stated the federal government had overstepped its bounds and that Congress had given itself too much power under the commerce clause. United States v. Lopez reaffirmed the balance of power between the federal government and state governments.

U.S. v. Lopez is a particularly significant case because it marked the first time in half a century that the Court held Congress had overstepped its power under the Commerce Clause.

Connections

U.S. v. Lopez (1995) is still cited in cases regarding the limits of the Commerce Clause. Here's a list of landmark Supreme Court cases dealing with the Commerce Clause.

• Related Cases:

  • United States v. Morrison

  • Gonzales v. Raich

  • Gibbons v Ogden

Fun Facts

• After a half century of the expansion of federal power, the SCOTUS set a limit on Congress' use of the Commerce Clause.

• 38% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

• 18 states allow an adult to carry a loaded gun on school grounds.

• More than a third of the states already allow teachers and other adults to carry guns to school. In most cases, all you need is the equivalent of a note from the principal — you usually don't even need law enforcement approval.

• Individual packs, which contain one 1.59-ounce serving, contain 30 to 35 candies. M&M's candies are also sold in bulk bags. A 5-pound bag contains approximately 2500 candies, while a 10-pound bag contains approximately 5000 pieces.

• Here are the 18 states that allow adults to carry loaded weapons onto school grounds with few or minor conditions:

• Alabama (which bans possessing a weapon on school grounds only if the carrier has "intent to do bodily harm")

• California (with approval of the superintendent)

• Connecticut (with approval of "school officials")

• Hawaii (no specific law)

• Idaho (with school trustees' approval)

• Iowa (with "authorization")

• Kentucky (with school board approval)

• Massachusetts (with approval of the school board or principal)

• Mississippi (with school board approval)

• Montana (with school trustees' permission)

• New Hampshire (ban applies only to pupils, not adults)

• New Jersey (with approval from the school's "governing officer")

• New York (with the school's approval)

• Oregon (with school board approval)

• Rhode Island (with a state concealed weapons permit)

• Texas (with the school's permission)

• Utah (with approval of the "responsible school administrator")

• Wyoming (as long as it's not concealed)

Resources

• U.S. v. Lopez at Oyez

• Listen to the Oral Arguments and the Opinion Announcement

• Read the NYTimes story on the outcome of US v. Lopez

• Read the entire Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990

• Read The Commerce Clause from the US Constitution.

• Read the entire United States v. Lopez ruling from JUSTIA

Critical Questions

1. Do you believe, like Justice Beyer (see above quote), that the Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990 is constitutional under the Commerce Clause?

2. What are some things the Commerce Clause has been used to regulate?

3. What is one consequence of the fact that this case limits, for the first time in a half century, the power of the Congress to use the Commerce Clause?

4. Read these two different interpretations of the Commerce Clause and explain which one you agree with more.

5. Do you agree with the Supreme Court's majority ruling in U.S. v. Lopez?

6. Some would say that the Commerce Clause has been the most powerful weapon in the expansion of the power of the Congress. If you had to list all the weapons in Congress' arsenal, what would you rank as the top five?

7. Imagine that you wanted a judicial conservative to have to uphold the constitutionality of Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990. Rewrite the Commerce Clause so that it has the power for a judicial conservative to allow Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990.

8. Here are the words of the Commerce Clause, "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;" Now write a rap, rhyme, song, or limerick about the Commerce Clause.

9. Write your own opinion for the case of U.S. v. Lopez

Back to the Supreme Court Cases Inquiry Learning Page